In re McCoy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re McCoy

940 A.2d 291, 193 N.J. 477, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 23

DecidedFebruary 6, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 940 A.2d 291 (In re McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McCoy, 940 A.2d 291, 193 N.J. 477, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 23 (N.J. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-179, concluding that VERA McCOY of CLE-MENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed), and RPC 1.4(c) (failure to explain matter to client to extent reasonably necessary to permit informed decisions), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that YERA McCOY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-179, concluding that VERA McCOY of CLE-MENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed), and RPC 1.4(c) (failure to explain matter to client to extent reasonably necessary to permit informed decisions), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that YERA McCOY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

940 A.2d 291, 193 N.J. 477, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mccoy-nj-2008.