In re McCotter

89 F. App'x 429
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 17, 2004
DocketNo. 03-7669
StatusPublished

This text of 89 F. App'x 429 (In re McCotter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re McCotter, 89 F. App'x 429 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Samuel DeWitt McCotter petitions this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to rule on his pending petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used in extraordinary circumstances. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). McCotter’s petition does not set forth exceptional circumstances as would warrant the issuance of a writ of mandamus at this time. We note, however, that no significant action has been taken in the district court for over nine months.

Accordingly, we deny McCotter’s mandamus petition without prejudice to his refiling it should the district court fail to act within a reasonable time. We grant McCotter’s application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)
811 F.2d 818 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 F. App'x 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mccotter-ca4-2004.