In re McClanahan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In re McClanahan

99 So. 2d 727

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 22, 1958

DocketNo. 57-186

StatusPublished

This text of 99 So. 2d 727 (In re McClanahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McClanahan, 99 So. 2d 727 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be considered by the Court on the motion of the appellee to quash and affirm the judgment appealed from, and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motions are seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on the appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to quash and motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same are, hereby granted, and the judgment is affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be considered by the Court on the motion of the appellee to quash and affirm the judgment appealed from, and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motions are seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on the appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to quash and motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same are, hereby granted, and the judgment is affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 So. 2d 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mcclanahan-fladistctapp-1958.