In re McCauley

Supreme Court

In re McCauley

165 U.S. 538

DecidedMarch 1, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 165 U.S. 538 (In re McCauley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McCauley, 165 U.S. 538 (1897).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chief Justice:

These are petitions for habeas corpus to discharge petitioners from confinement on convictions under the oleomargarine law on the ground of -the unconstitutionality of that enactment. So far as that question is concerned, it is conceded that the records are substantially the same as the record in Kol-' lock's case just decided, and the applications must be disposed of in the same way.

Writs denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chief Justice:

These are petitions for habeas corpus to discharge petitioners from confinement on convictions under the oleomargarine law on the ground of -the unconstitutionality of that enactment. So far as that question is concerned, it is conceded that the records are substantially the same as the record in Kol-' lock's case just decided, and the applications must be disposed of in the same way.

Writs denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 U.S. 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mccauley-scotus-1897.