In re McCarthy

8 F. Supp. 518, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1429
District Court, W.D. New York·Decided July 31, 1934·No. No. 21619·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

KNIGHT, District Judge.

Judgment was recovered against the bankrupt herein for personal injuries sustained by reason of the negligent operation by the bankrupt of his automobile. A garnishee execution was issued on such judgment and bankrupt now seeks an order restraining the judgment creditor and the sheriff of Erie county from receiving further money under such execution. The judgment creditor objects to the granting of such motion on the ground that the injury was willful and malicious and therefore not dischargeable.

The eomplaint does not allege and the record does not show that the damages were sustained by reason of any willful and malicious act of the bankrupt. This court has held under a parallel state of facts that a judgment such as obtained here is discharge-able. In re Kubiniec (D. C.) 2 F. Supp. 632. This view is sustained by many authorities. Tinker v. Colwell, 193 U. S. 473, 24 S. Ct. 505, 48 L. Ed. 754; Lewis v. Roberts, 267 U. S. 467, 45 S. Ct. 357, 69 L. Ed. 739, 37 A. L. R. 1440; In re Harber (C. C. A.) 9 F.(2d) 551; In re Vena (D. C.) 46 F.(2d) 81; In re Madigan (D. C.) 254 F. 221.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re McCarthy, 8 F. Supp. 518, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1429 (W.D.N.Y. 1934).

8 F. Supp. 518 (In re McCarthy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Harris
24 Ohio Misc. 267 (S.D. Ohio, 1970)
In re Ellman
48 F. Supp. 518 (W.D. New York, 1942)