In re McCalip

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re McCalip

192 So. 3d 111, 2016 WL 2994177, 2016 La. LEXIS 1228

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 20, 2016

DocketNo. 2016-B-0545

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 So. 3d 111 (In re McCalip) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McCalip, 192 So. 3d 111, 2016 WL 2994177, 2016 La. LEXIS 1228 (La. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

| ¡The Office of. Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent notarized a document outside the presence of the signatory and witnesses. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Chase McNeil McCalip, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26408, be ■ ¡publicly reprimanded. It is further ordered that respondent shall attend the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Ethics School.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED .that all costs and expenses.in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX,' § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

| ¡The Office of. Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent notarized a document outside the presence of the signatory and witnesses. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Chase McNeil McCalip, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26408, be ■ ¡publicly reprimanded. It is further ordered that respondent shall attend the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Ethics School.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED .that all costs and expenses.in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX,' § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 So. 3d 111, 2016 WL 2994177, 2016 La. LEXIS 1228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mccalip-la-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack