In re McBride

167 So. 3d 619, 2015 La. LEXIS 1478, 2015 WL 3994396
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 30, 2015·No. No. 2015-B-1022·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

11 Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he failed to make reasonable efforts to ensure that other lawyers in his law firm conformed their conduct to the Rules of Professional Conduct, in violation of Rule 5.1(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Thomas C. McBride, Louisiana Bar Roll number 9210, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, ■with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re McBride, 167 So. 3d 619, 2015 La. LEXIS 1478, 2015 WL 3994396 (La. 2015).

167 So. 3d 619 (In re McBride) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.