In re McAdam

S.D. New York

In re McAdam

98 F. 409, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 252

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 98 F. 409 (In re McAdam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McAdam, 98 F. 409, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 252 (S.D.N.Y. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). I am not wholly satisfied that the trustee might not be entitled to some pro rata part of any moneys hereafter realized on the bankrupt’s contracts ; but there is such doubt on the question that it is impossible to hold the defendant to have “committed an offense” in acting on the contrary hypothesis, or that in so doing he fraudulently concealed anything, or knowingly made a false oath.

Discharge granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). I am not wholly satisfied that the trustee might not be entitled to some pro rata part of any moneys hereafter realized on the bankrupt’s contracts ; but there is such doubt on the question that it is impossible to hold the defendant to have “committed an offense” in acting on the contrary hypothesis, or that in so doing he fraudulently concealed anything, or knowingly made a false oath.

Discharge granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 F. 409, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mcadam-nysd-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack