In re McAdam

98 F. 409, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 252
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 23, 1899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BROWN, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). I am not wholly satisfied that the trustee might not be entitled to some pro rata part of any moneys hereafter realized on the bankrupt’s contracts ; but there is such doubt on the question that it is impossible to hold the defendant to have “committed an offense” in acting on the contrary hypothesis, or that in so doing he fraudulently concealed anything, or knowingly made a false oath.

Discharge granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re McAdam, 98 F. 409, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 252 (S.D.N.Y. 1899).

98 F. 409 (In re McAdam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Woodworth
15 F. Supp. 291 (S.D. New York, 1936)