In re Mc Alevy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Mc Alevy

772 A.2d 918, 167 N.J. 607, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 697

DecidedJune 6, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 772 A.2d 918 (In re Mc Alevy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mc Alevy, 772 A.2d 918, 167 N.J. 607, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 697 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-055 concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14, DENNIS D.S. MC ALEVY of UNION CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, should be reprimanded, respondent having been reprimanded by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on August 31, 1999, for violating RPC 1.4(b) (failure to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decision regarding the representation) and RPC 1.2(a) (failure to abide by a client’s decision as to whether client should testify), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DENNIS D.S. MC ALEVY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[608]*608ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-055 concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14, DENNIS D.S. MC ALEVY of UNION CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, should be reprimanded, respondent having been reprimanded by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on August 31, 1999, for violating RPC 1.4(b) (failure to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decision regarding the representation) and RPC 1.2(a) (failure to abide by a client’s decision as to whether client should testify), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DENNIS D.S. MC ALEVY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[608]*608ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

772 A.2d 918, 167 N.J. 607, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mc-alevy-nj-2001.