In re Mayor of New York

4 Cow. 542
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1825·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The Court said, they had examined the questions presented by his case, and the authorities cited; and were satisfied that the commissioners had proceeded upon a wrong principle; that the mere abuttal upon Mercer Street did not amount to an implied grant of way. (Underwood v. Stuyvesant, 19 John. Rep. 181.) And they adopted what was said upon a similar point, by Parsons, C. J. in Clapp v. M’Neil, (4 Mass. Rep. 590.) The Court holding that the claimants were entitled' to compensation without regard to the supposed easement, the matter was again referred to the commissioners for review upon this principle, and the present motion denied.

Rule accordingly

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Mayor of New York, 4 Cow. 542 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).

4 Cow. 542 (In re Mayor of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of City of N.Y. (Northern Blvd.)
179 N.E. 321 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)
In re One Hundred & Sixteenth Street
1 A.D. 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
In re the Opening of One Hundred & Sixteenth Street
73 N.Y. St. Rep. 100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Howe v. Alger
86 Mass. 206 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1862)
Bissell v. New York Central Railroad
9 N.Y. 61 (New York Court of Appeals, 1861)
Bissell v. . the New York Central R.R. Company
23 N.Y. 61 (New York Court of Appeals, 1861)
Champlin v. Laytin
1 Edw. Ch. 467 (New York Court of Chancery, 1832)