In re Mayo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Mayo

26 A.D.2d 833, 275 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3273

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 24, 1966·Published

Opinion

Pursuant to the provisions of law (N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 2; Judiciary Law, § 90; CPLR 9401), William A. Mayo, Esq., a practicing lawyer and resident of the Town of Goshen, County of Orange, is hereby appointed, effective October 24, 1966 (in place of Rainey S. Taylor, Esq., resigned), as a member of the Ninth Judicial [834] District Committee on Character and Fitness, to investigate the character and fitness of applicants in said district for admission to practice as attorneys and counselors at law in the courts of this State. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan, Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to the provisions of law (N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 2; Judiciary Law, § 90; CPLR 9401), William A. Mayo, Esq., a practicing lawyer and resident of the Town of Goshen, County of Orange, is hereby appointed, effective October 24, 1966 (in place of Rainey S. Taylor, Esq., resigned), as a member of the Ninth Judicial [834] District Committee on Character and Fitness, to investigate the character and fitness of applicants in said district for admission to practice as attorneys and counselors at law in the courts of this State. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan, Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

In re Mayo, 26 A.D.2d 833, 275 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3273 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

26 A.D.2d 833 (In re Mayo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related