in Re Max F. Stovall and Max F. Stovall, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Max F. Stovall and Max F. Stovall, P.C.

DecidedMarch 20, 2019

Docket01-19-00192-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Max F. Stovall and Max F. Stovall, P.C. (in Re Max F. Stovall and Max F. Stovall, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Max F. Stovall and Max F. Stovall, P.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Max F. Stovall and Max F. Stovall, P.C.

Appellate case number: 01-19-00192-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-34723

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County

Relators, Max F. Stovall and Max F. Stovall, P.C., have filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s March 5, 2019 order (1) denying Relators’ motion for protective order and (2) ordering Relators to provide a copy of the order, within 5 days, to JP Morgan Chase Bank with instructions to produce certain requested account records. In conjunction with the petition, Relators have filed a motion requesting a temporary stay of the trial court’s order pending this Court’s resolution of the petition. Relator’s motion for a temporary stay of the trial court’s order is granted and it is ordered that the trial court’s March 5, 2019 order in the above-referenced trial court cause is stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). This stay is effective until the mandamus petition in this Court is finally decided or the Court otherwise orders the stay lifted. See id. Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the stay. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(c). It is further ordered that the real parties in interest file their response, if any, to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus by no later than April 11, 2019.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Justice Sarah B. Landau_ Acting individually

Date: _March 20, 2019___

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Max F. Stovall and Max F. Stovall, P.C.

Appellate case number: 01-19-00192-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-34723

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County

Relators, Max F. Stovall and Max F. Stovall, P.C., have filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s March 5, 2019 order (1) denying Relators’ motion for protective order and (2) ordering Relators to provide a copy of the order, within 5 days, to JP Morgan Chase Bank with instructions to produce certain requested account records. In conjunction with the petition, Relators have filed a motion requesting a temporary stay of the trial court’s order pending this Court’s resolution of the petition. Relator’s motion for a temporary stay of the trial court’s order is granted and it is ordered that the trial court’s March 5, 2019 order in the above-referenced trial court cause is stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). This stay is effective until the mandamus petition in this Court is finally decided or the Court otherwise orders the stay lifted. See id. Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the stay. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(c). It is further ordered that the real parties in interest file their response, if any, to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus by no later than April 11, 2019.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Justice Sarah B. Landau_ Acting individually

Date: _March 20, 2019___

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re Max F. Stovall and Max F. Stovall, P.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-max-f-stovall-and-max-f-stovall-pc-texapp-2019.