In re Maule Paving Co.

S.D. Florida

In re Maule Paving Co.

298 F. 358, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1637

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida

DecidedApril 8, 1924

DocketNo. 2683

StatusPublished

This text of 298 F. 358 (In re Maule Paving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Maule Paving Co., 298 F. 358, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1637 (S.D. Fla. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

CALL, District Judge.

This cause comes on for a hearing upon the application of the attorneys for petitioning creditors for allowance of attorney’s fees, etc. It appears that the bankrupt’s schedules were filed in the clerk’s office on March 18, 1924.

The petition for the allowance never appears to have been filed before the referee, but does bear the file mark of the clerk of this court, dated March 24, 1924. The petition for attorney’s fees has attached to it the affidavits of two practicing attorneys of this court, taken before a notary public, as to the amount proper in their judgment to be allowed as such fees. An order by the referee is presented, dated March 22, 1924, allowing $3,500 attorney’s fees, based upon the petition and affidavits, and it is upon these papers, and one copy of the bankrupt’s schedules, approval of this court is asked.

It seems to me that the application is premature, to say the least. No showing of the value of-the estate is made, other than what is contained in the petition itself and the values placed upon the assets by the bankrupt. Apparently no appraiserhent of the estate had been made. The schedules show debts to the amount of—secured, $29,779.95; and unsecured, $171,690.23. The assets are shown of the value of ¡$39,566.47; $32,805.00 machinery. This statement of values seems to have been adopted by the petitioners in their petition. Under the conditions shown, it is my opinion that no allowance for attorney’s fees should be made at this time, and for this reason the order of the referee making such allowance is disapproved, except’for the amount of $74 for costs advanced.

In this connection it is proper to say that this proceeding seems to have been taken before the referee without notice to the creditors interested in the estate. The question of fixing fees to be paid out of the estate being administered is a judicial question, and ordinarily ought not to be decided with no notice to the parties interested in the estate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CALL, District Judge.

This cause comes on for a hearing upon the application of the attorneys for petitioning creditors for allowance of attorney’s fees, etc. It appears that the bankrupt’s schedules were filed in the clerk’s office on March 18, 1924.

The petition for the allowance never appears to have been filed before the referee, but does bear the file mark of the clerk of this court, dated March 24, 1924. The petition for attorney’s fees has attached to it the affidavits of two practicing attorneys of this court, taken before a notary public, as to the amount proper in their judgment to be allowed as such fees. An order by the referee is presented, dated March 22, 1924, allowing $3,500 attorney’s fees, based upon the petition and affidavits, and it is upon these papers, and one copy of the bankrupt’s schedules, approval of this court is asked.

It seems to me that the application is premature, to say the least. No showing of the value of-the estate is made, other than what is contained in the petition itself and the values placed upon the assets by the bankrupt. Apparently no appraiserhent of the estate had been made. The schedules show debts to the amount of—secured, $29,779.95; and unsecured, $171,690.23. The assets are shown of the value of ¡$39,566.47; $32,805.00 machinery. This statement of values seems to have been adopted by the petitioners in their petition. Under the conditions shown, it is my opinion that no allowance for attorney’s fees should be made at this time, and for this reason the order of the referee making such allowance is disapproved, except’for the amount of $74 for costs advanced.

In this connection it is proper to say that this proceeding seems to have been taken before the referee without notice to the creditors interested in the estate. The question of fixing fees to be paid out of the estate being administered is a judicial question, and ordinarily ought not to be decided with no notice to the parties interested in the estate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 F. 358, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-maule-paving-co-flsd-1924.