In re Matthew T.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

In re Matthew T.

527 A.2d 319, 1987 Me. LEXIS 770

DecidedJune 26, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 527 A.2d 319 (In re Matthew T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Matthew T., 527 A.2d 319, 1987 Me. LEXIS 770 (Me. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

Mary Lou T. appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Augusta) terminating her parental rights to her adopted son. 22 M.R.S.A. § 4055 (Supp.1986). She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support termination. Examining the evidence in a light most favorable to the party prevailing in the District Court, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to persuade the factfinder that the statutory requirements were proven to a high probability. See In re John Joseph V., 500 A.2d 628, 629 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

Mary Lou T. appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Augusta) terminating her parental rights to her adopted son. 22 M.R.S.A. § 4055 (Supp.1986). She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support termination. Examining the evidence in a light most favorable to the party prevailing in the District Court, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to persuade the factfinder that the statutory requirements were proven to a high probability. See In re John Joseph V., 500 A.2d 628, 629 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

527 A.2d 319, 1987 Me. LEXIS 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-matthew-t-me-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack