in Re Matthew James Leachman
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-12-00346-CV
|
In re Matthew James Leachman |
RELATOR |
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Nothing in this opinion shall be construed as a ruling on the trial court’s failure to rule on the merits of “Relator’s Verified Petition To Take Deposition Before Suit,” which remains pending in the trial court until ruled on by that court.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
LIVINGSTON, C.J. would request a response.
DELIVERED: August 23, 2012
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Matthew James Leachman (in Re Matthew James Leachman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.