in Re Matthew Jamal Jackson
This text of in Re Matthew Jamal Jackson (in Re Matthew Jamal Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 29, 2015
No. 04-15-00370-CR
IN RE Matthew Jamal JACKSON
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
On June 18, 2015, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s application for leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED AS MOOT. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on June 29, 2015.
_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of June, 2015.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CR0148, styled The State of Texas v. Matthew Jamal Jackson, pending in the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ronald Rangel presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Matthew Jamal Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-matthew-jamal-jackson-texapp-2015.