In Re Matter of C.C., 2008-G-2838 (12-19-2008)

2008 Ohio 6776
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 19, 2008
DocketNo. 2008-G-2838.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2008 Ohio 6776 (In Re Matter of C.C., 2008-G-2838 (12-19-2008)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Matter of C.C., 2008-G-2838 (12-19-2008), 2008 Ohio 6776 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).

Opinions

OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant, C.C., appeals the judgment of the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, imposing a driver's license suspension pursuant to R.C. 2152.19(A)(4)(I) and R.C. 2925.11(E)(2), following a guilty plea for Possession of Marijuana, in violation of R.C. 2925.11(A). For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the court below. *Page 2

{¶ 2} On January 11, 2008, a police officer with the Chardon Police Department stopped C.C.'s vehicle after noticing the vehicle's rear license plate was not illuminated and the license plate sticker was expired. As the officer spoke with C.C., he noticed the odor of burnt marijuana emanating from the car. Upon searching the vehicle, the officer found marijuana and drug paraphernalia.

{¶ 3} On January 30, 2008, a complaint was filed in Juvenile Court alleging that C.C. was a delinquent child for Possession of Drug Paraphernalia and Possession of Marijuana, in violation of R.C. 2925.14(C)(1) and R.C. 2925.11(A), respectively. C.C. moved to suppress the evidence from the traffic stop and, after a hearing by the Juvenile Court, the motion was denied.

{¶ 4} On April 14, 2008, C.C. pled true to count two of the complaint, Possession of Marijuana, and count one, Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, was dismissed. The court accepted the plea and found C.C. was a delinquent child as charged for having violated R.C. 2925.11(A), Possession of Marijuana, a minor misdemeanor.

{¶ 5} At the sentencing hearing, C.C. objected to the imposition of a driver's license suspension because juvenile dispositions are not permitted to be made public, and the suspension of C.C.'s license would be public through his BMV records on the Law Enforcement Automated Data System ("LEADS"). The court disagreed. C.C. was sentenced to 1-30 days in a detention center, which was suspended, 40 hours of community service, a 500 word essay on what C.C. learned from this experience, his driver's license was suspended pursuant to R.C. 2152.19(A)(4)(I) and *Page 3

R.C. 2925.11(E)(2), random drug screenings until C.C.'s 18th birthday, a $50 fine, and court costs.

{¶ 6} C.C. timely appeals and raises the following assignment of error:

{¶ 7} "[1.] The Trial Court erred in deciding to impose a license suspension as part of the sentence against appellant-defendant after the Court was made aware of the fact his sanction would be accessible to the public."

{¶ 8} R.C. 2152.19 prescribes that if a child is adjudicated a delinquent child, the court may impose a "suspension of the driver's license, probationary driver's license, or temporary instruction permit issued to the child for a period of time prescribed by the court, or a suspension of the registration of all motor vehicles registered in the name of the child for a period of time prescribed by the court." R.C. 2152.19(A)(4)(I). R.C. 2925.11(E)(2) mandates that "[t]he court shall suspend for not less than six months or more than five years the offender's driver's or commercial driver's license or permit" for a conviction of Possession of Drugs charge.

{¶ 9} Juv. R. 37 prescribes restrictions on the use of juvenile records, mandating "[n]o public use shall be made by any person, including a party, of any juvenile court record, including the recording or transcript of any juvenile court hearing, except in the course of an appeal or as authorized by order of the court or by statute." Juv. R. 37(B).

{¶ 10} Ohio Administrative Code 4501:2-10-06(B) restricts all information contained in or processed through the LEADS to the use of law enforcement agencies and criminal justice agencies for the administration of criminal justice. Id. "Access to the LEADS [is] limited to certified operators." Ohio Adm. Code 4501:2-10-06(A). Although "BMV records * * * may be accessed by criminal justice agencies for the *Page 4 purpose of providing governmental, non-criminal justice agencies limited criminal background investigations for administrative purposes", LEADS information is not record available to the general public. Id. "[R]ecords of information contained in or processed through LEADS, including data entered directly into a LEADS data base, computer tape logs created by LEADS of transactions on LEADS, and hard copies of data on a LEADS data base or from other data bases accessed through LEADS, are not public records subject to disclosure pursuant to R.C. 149.43(B)." 1994 Ohio Atty.Gen.Ops. No. 46, 1994 Ohio AG LEXIS 44, at syllabus. Therefore, the inclusion of C.C.'s license suspension on a LEADS report does not violate Juv. R. 37 because LEADS information is not for public use.

{¶ 11} There are protections in place to make sure LEADS is not disseminated to the public. The administrative code mandates that "[a]ppropriate application and agreement forms shall be executed before access is permitted to LEADS or to data supplied as part of LEADS. These forms must be kept current and will be reviewed and updated biennially as part of the agency audit. The completed forms will be filed with LEADS and the user agency." Ohio Adm. Code 4501:2-10-03. Cobb's counsel admitted at oral arguments that there is a prohibition against sharing the information obtained from LEADS. He even stated that the highway patrol is supposed to prosecute offenders. The administrative code explicitly states that "[f]ailure to abide by these rules may result in the termination of LEADS services and/or prosecution when appropriate". Ohio Adm. Code 4501:2-10-13(A).

{¶ 12} Due to the fact that LEADS information is not public record and protections and prohibitions against improper use and dissemination are in the *Page 5 administrative code,___ C.C.'s hypothetical argument that a potential employer or college could see his license suspension and believe he has a criminal record is not valid.

{¶ 13} C.C. also raises the argument that his license suspension due to possession of marijuana is accessible to the public via his Bureau of Motor Vehicles record.

{¶ 14} The right of access to public records is codified by R.C. 149.43(B) which provides that: "all public records * * * shall be promptly prepared and made available for inspection to any person at all reasonable times during regular business hours. * * * [U]pon request, a public office or person responsible for public records shall make copies * * * available at cost and within a reasonable period of time. * * * To facilitate broader access to public records, a public office or the person responsible for public records shall organize and maintain public records in a manner that they can be made available for inspection or copying in accordance with [this] division." R.C. 149.43(B)(1) and (2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ackley v. Washington Court House Police Dept.
2025 Ohio 2882 (Ohio Court of Claims, 2025)
State v. Wheeler
2016 Ohio 2964 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2008 Ohio 6776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-matter-of-cc-2008-g-2838-12-19-2008-ohioctapp-2008.