In Re Matter of Bikoff

748 A.2d 915, 2000 WL 305476
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 12, 1995
Docket95-BG-530
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 748 A.2d 915 (In Re Matter of Bikoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Matter of Bikoff, 748 A.2d 915, 2000 WL 305476 (D.C. 1995).

Opinion

ORDER

PER curiam:.

On consideration of the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, recommending that the respondent be suspended for sixty days, letter from Bar Counsel electing not to note an exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, Letter from respondent electing not to note an exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, and respondent’s unopposed motion for shortening of time within which suspension takes effect, it is

ORDERED, sua sponte, that, pursuant to Rule XI, § 11(f)(1) of the Rules Governing the Bar, effective January 1, 1995, the recommendation by the Board on Professional Responsibility to impose discipline consisting of a sixty day suspension from the practice of law is hereby adopted and imposed by this Court. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s motion is granted and the sixty day suspension shall be nunc pro tunc to July 7,1995. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is drawn to the requirement of D.C.App.Rule XI, § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and to the provisions of § 16(c) dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with § 14, including the filing of the required affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Clarke
29 A.3d 472 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)
In Re Stillwell
980 A.2d 430 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
In re Wittenberg
945 A.2d 615 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
748 A.2d 915, 2000 WL 305476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-matter-of-bikoff-dc-1995.