In re Mastropieri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Mastropieri

80 A.D.2d 625, 436 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10324

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 80 A.D.2d 625 (In re Mastropieri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mastropieri, 80 A.D.2d 625, 436 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by Eugene F. Mastropieri, an attorney and counselor at law, who was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, on a jury’s verdict on January 9, 1981, of violating the laws of the United States (US Code, tit 18, §§ 2, 371; tit 26, § 7201) to stay his suspension from the practice of law pending determination of the appeal from said conviction and pending determination of any disciplinary proceedings now pending against him or to be instituted against him in this court. The Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts cross-moves to immediately suspend Eugene F. Mastropieri from the practice of law upon his conviction for a serious crime and to authorize the institution of a disciplinary proceeding against him on the charges for which he was convicted and on any other charges which may come to the attention of the committee. Motion denied. Cross motion granted. Eugene F. Mastro[626]*626pieri was automatically suspended effective January 20, 1981, the date that his conviction was filed with this court (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd 4,' par f) and said suspension is continued until further order of this court. The Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts is authorized to prosecute a proceeding based on the charges upon which he was convicted and to bring a supplemental petition on any other charges which have come or which may come to its attention. Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Esq., Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Suite 1200, Municipal Building, Brooklyn, New York, is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in such proceeding. The allegations set forth in the criminal prosecution and the issues which may be raised in any subsequent petition and answer thereto are referred to Hon. Mario Pittoni, a retired Justice of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, of 51 Watts Place, Lynbrook, New York 11563, as Special Referee, to hear and to report with his findings upon each of the issues. Hopkins, J.P., Damiani, Lazer, Gibbons and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by Eugene F. Mastropieri, an attorney and counselor at law, who was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, on a jury’s verdict on January 9, 1981, of violating the laws of the United States (US Code, tit 18, §§ 2, 371; tit 26, § 7201) to stay his suspension from the practice of law pending determination of the appeal from said conviction and pending determination of any disciplinary proceedings now pending against him or to be instituted against him in this court. The Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts cross-moves to immediately suspend Eugene F. Mastropieri from the practice of law upon his conviction for a serious crime and to authorize the institution of a disciplinary proceeding against him on the charges for which he was convicted and on any other charges which may come to the attention of the committee. Motion denied. Cross motion granted. Eugene F. Mastro[626]*626pieri was automatically suspended effective January 20, 1981, the date that his conviction was filed with this court (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd 4,' par f) and said suspension is continued until further order of this court. The Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts is authorized to prosecute a proceeding based on the charges upon which he was convicted and to bring a supplemental petition on any other charges which have come or which may come to its attention. Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Esq., Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Suite 1200, Municipal Building, Brooklyn, New York, is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in such proceeding. The allegations set forth in the criminal prosecution and the issues which may be raised in any subsequent petition and answer thereto are referred to Hon. Mario Pittoni, a retired Justice of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, of 51 Watts Place, Lynbrook, New York 11563, as Special Referee, to hear and to report with his findings upon each of the issues. Hopkins, J.P., Damiani, Lazer, Gibbons and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.2d 625, 436 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mastropieri-nyappdiv-1981.