in Re: Massey Lee Moore

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 15, 2005
Docket12-05-00183-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Massey Lee Moore (in Re: Massey Lee Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Massey Lee Moore, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                                                                                                                 NO. 12-05-00183-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT


TYLER, TEXAS


§


IN RE: MASSEY LEE MOORE,                      §     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING







MEMORANDUM OPINION

            Relator Massey Lee Moore, proceeding pro se and informa pauperis, seeks a writ of mandamus against Pam Pugh, in her capacity as District Clerk of Houston County, Texas. Specifically, he requests that Pugh be compelled to file his original petition in an action styled “Massey Lee Moore v. Burger King QLFW, Inc.,” place the cause on her docket, and issue citation against the defendant.

            A court of appeals has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district and all writs necessary to enforce its jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(b) (Vernon 2004-05). In order for a district clerk to fall within our jurisdictional reach, it must be established that the issuance of the writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See id. § 22.221(a), (b); In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). Relator has not demonstrated that the exercise of our mandamus authority against the respondent is appropriate to enforce our jurisdiction. Consequently, we deny the writ of mandamus.

                                                                                                     JAMES T. WORTHEN

                                                                                                                 Chief Justice

Opinion delivered June 15, 2005.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. and DeVasto, J.



(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Coronado
980 S.W.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Massey Lee Moore, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-massey-lee-moore-texapp-2005.