In re Massell

D. Massachusetts

In re Massell

285 F. 577, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1169

CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts

DecidedDecember 12, 1922

DocketNo. 29308

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 285 F. 577 (In re Massell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Massell, 285 F. 577, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1169 (D. Mass. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

MORTON, District Judge.

On November 14, 1919, the bankrupt, Morris Massell, filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, on which he was on the same day adjudicated bankrupt. On December 4, 1919, a trustee was duly appointed and qualified. On December 20, 1919, the bankrupt offered a composition of 40 per cent, and petitioned that a meeting of his creditors be called to act upon his proposal. On January 17, 1920, the referee reported that all necessary steps had been complied with under the composition proceedings and recommended that the composition be confirmed. On February 3, 1920, orders of court were entered in the usual form, confirming the composition and directing the distribution of the deposit. On December 18, 1919, the bankrupt had filed a petition for discharge, the order of notice on which was made returnable on February 16, 1920. This petition for discharge was not prosecuted, as .the order confirming the composition operated as a discharge.

The present proceedings were initiated by an involuntary petition against the bankrupt, who is the same person as in the proceedings above outlined, which was filed September 30, 1921. Massell was adjudicated on October 14, 1921. - On March 17, 1922, he filed his petition for discharge. He answered the interrogatories that he had been discharged on February 3, 1920, in composition proceedings. Objection is made to the discharge on the ground that Massell had “in voluntary proceedings been granted a discharge in bankruptcy within six years.” Bankruptcy Act, § 14b (5), being Comp. St. § 9598.

The question is whether the discharge incident to the confirmation of the composition was a discharge in bankruptcy in voluntary proceedings. It can be pleaded as a discharge and has all the effect of one. Mandell v. Levy, 14 Am. Bankr. Rep. 549 (Sup.) 93 N. Y. Supp. 545. The precise question here presented was raised on similar facts in Re Radley (D. C.) 252 Fed. 205, and it was held by Judge Ray that the confirmation of the composition was a discharge in voluntary proceedings. I agree with his conclusion. See, too, Collier on Bankruptcy (12th Ed.) p. 398.

Discharge refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORTON, District Judge.

On November 14, 1919, the bankrupt, Morris Massell, filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, on which he was on the same day adjudicated bankrupt. On December 4, 1919, a trustee was duly appointed and qualified. On December 20, 1919, the bankrupt offered a composition of 40 per cent, and petitioned that a meeting of his creditors be called to act upon his proposal. On January 17, 1920, the referee reported that all necessary steps had been complied with under the composition proceedings and recommended that the composition be confirmed. On February 3, 1920, orders of court were entered in the usual form, confirming the composition and directing the distribution of the deposit. On December 18, 1919, the bankrupt had filed a petition for discharge, the order of notice on which was made returnable on February 16, 1920. This petition for discharge was not prosecuted, as .the order confirming the composition operated as a discharge.

The present proceedings were initiated by an involuntary petition against the bankrupt, who is the same person as in the proceedings above outlined, which was filed September 30, 1921. Massell was adjudicated on October 14, 1921. - On March 17, 1922, he filed his petition for discharge. He answered the interrogatories that he had been discharged on February 3, 1920, in composition proceedings. Objection is made to the discharge on the ground that Massell had “in voluntary proceedings been granted a discharge in bankruptcy within six years.” Bankruptcy Act, § 14b (5), being Comp. St. § 9598.

The question is whether the discharge incident to the confirmation of the composition was a discharge in bankruptcy in voluntary proceedings. It can be pleaded as a discharge and has all the effect of one. Mandell v. Levy, 14 Am. Bankr. Rep. 549 (Sup.) 93 N. Y. Supp. 545. The precise question here presented was raised on similar facts in Re Radley (D. C.) 252 Fed. 205, and it was held by Judge Ray that the confirmation of the composition was a discharge in voluntary proceedings. I agree with his conclusion. See, too, Collier on Bankruptcy (12th Ed.) p. 398.

Discharge refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 F. 577, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-massell-mad-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack