in Re Mary T. Ard
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-10-00263-CV
IN RE MARY T. ARD RELATOR
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and
“Motion to Strike Real Parties in Interest’s Response and to Strike Affidavit of
William A. Hudson II from the Mandamus Record” and is of the opinion that all
relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and
motion to strike are denied.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4., 52.8(d). Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let
execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DELIVERED: October 7, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Mary T. Ard (in Re Mary T. Ard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.