in Re Mary T. Ard

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 7, 2010·No. 02-10-00263-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00263-CV

IN RE MARY T. ARD RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

“Motion to Strike Real Parties in Interest’s Response and to Strike Affidavit of

William A. Hudson II from the Mandamus Record” and is of the opinion that all

relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

motion to strike are denied.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4., 52.8(d). Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let

execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: October 7, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Mary T. Ard, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

in Re Mary T. Ard (in Re Mary T. Ard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.