In Re Mary K. Hays

210 F. App'x 995
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 19, 2006·No. 2006-1311·Unpublished

Opinion

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Mary K. Hays appeals the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferenees (“the Board”). The Board affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 12-14, 16, and 18-20 in U.S. Patent Application No. 10/190,039 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 4,475,676. Ex parte Hays, No. 06-0173 (Dec. 22, 2005). Because the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office has conceded that the Board’s decision is in error with respect to the anticipation rejection, we vacate and remand. See In re Gould, 673 F.2d 1385, 1387 (C.C.P.A.1982) (granting a motion for remand where “the Commissioner has informed us, through the solicitor that the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) will enter a new rejection of the sole claim on appeal.. .whenever it regains jurisdiction over the subject application”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Mary K. Hays, 210 F. App'x 995 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

210 F. App'x 995 (In Re Mary K. Hays) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Gould
673 F.2d 1385 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1982)