In re Mary Ann K.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Mary Ann K.

40 A.D.2d 696, 336 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3760

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 16, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 696 (In re Mary Ann K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mary Ann K., 40 A.D.2d 696, 336 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child-neglect proceeding, appeal from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated June 7, 1971, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. In accordance with the written stipulation of. the attorneys for the respective parties, dated September 6, 1972, this affirmance " shall not operate as res judicata or as collateral estoppel with regard to the adoption proceeding now pending in the Surrogate’s Court, Richmond County, and in the habeas corpus proceeding now pending in the Supreme Court, Richmond County, as to the parties on this appeal.” Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child-neglect proceeding, appeal from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated June 7, 1971, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. In accordance with the written stipulation of. the attorneys for the respective parties, dated September 6, 1972, this affirmance " shall not operate as res judicata or as collateral estoppel with regard to the adoption proceeding now pending in the Surrogate’s Court, Richmond County, and in the habeas corpus proceeding now pending in the Supreme Court, Richmond County, as to the parties on this appeal.” Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 696, 336 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mary-ann-k-nyappdiv-1972.