In re Marvin W.

306 A.D.2d 289, 760 N.Y.S.2d 337
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 2, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 289 (In re Marvin W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Marvin W., 306 A.D.2d 289, 760 N.Y.S.2d 337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to [290]*290Mental Hygiene Law article 81, the alleged, incapacitated person appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated June 19, 2002, as denied, without a hearing, his motion to terminate the guardianship.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Rockland County, for a new determination after a hearing pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 81.36 (c).

The Supreme Court erred in denying the motion to terminate the guardianship without conducting a hearing. Mental Hygiene Law § 81.36 (c) requires that a hearing be held in order to determine whether a guardianship should be terminated. At the hearing, the burden of proof is on the person objecting to the termination of the guardianship to establish by “clear and convincing evidence” that the guardian’s authority should not be terminated (see Law Revision Commn Comments, reprinted following McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 34A, Mental Hygiene Law § 81.36, at 439). Accordingly, we remit the matter for a new determination after a hearing pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 81.36 (c). Altman, J.P., Florio, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CATHOLIC FAMILY CENTER, MTR. OF
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
In re the Proceedings Under Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law
132 A.D.3d 1344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
In re William J.J.
32 A.D.3d 517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
guardianship/conservatorship of Van Sickle
2005 ND 69 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 A.D.2d 289, 760 N.Y.S.2d 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marvin-w-nyappdiv-2003.