In re Marvin S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Marvin S.

246 A.D.2d 361, 666 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 221

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D.2d 361 (In re Marvin S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Marvin S., 246 A.D.2d 361, 666 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Terrance McMrath, J.), entered on or about November 20, 1996, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 15 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s findings were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility were properly placed before the Family Court and we find no basis to disturb its resolution of those issues. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Terrance McMrath, J.), entered on or about November 20, 1996, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 15 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s findings were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility were properly placed before the Family Court and we find no basis to disturb its resolution of those issues. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D.2d 361, 666 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marvin-s-nyappdiv-1998.