In re Marvin
This text of 232 A.D. 773 (In re Marvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon investigation we find that nothing has been presented to warrant further ration on the part of this court. It appears from the record of the trial that the decision was made upon conflicting evidence. The decision was reversed, and the reversal constituted a complete vindication of Miss Simmons, the complainant. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marvin-nyappdiv-1931.