in Re: Marvin L. Malone

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 8, 2013·No. 05-13-00419-CV·Published

Opinion

DENIED; Opinion Filed April 8, 2013.

SIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00419-CV

IN RE MARVIN L. MALONE, Relator

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F85-98931-IM

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans Relator contends the trial court did not properly rule on his motion for judgment nunc pro

tunc. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein.

Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief

requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist.,

34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

/David W. Evans/ DAVID W. EVANS JUSTICE

130419F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Marvin L. Malone, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re: Marvin L. Malone (in Re: Marvin L. Malone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simon v. Levario
306 S.W.3d 318 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Hill v. Court of Appeals for Fifth Dist.
34 S.W.3d 924 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)