in Re Marvin Holmes
This text of in Re Marvin Holmes (in Re Marvin Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________
NO. 09-15-00318-CR ________________
IN RE MARVIN HOLMES __________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 08-04992-A __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Marvin Holmes filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, in
which he alleges that the trial court illegally sentenced him after he pleaded no
contest pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. Holmes has not demonstrated that he
is clearly entitled to mandamus relief from this Court. See State ex rel. Hill v.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001)
(orig. proceeding) (To demonstrate entitlement to a writ of mandamus, a relator
must establish that the trial court failed to perform a ministerial duty, and that
1 relator has no other adequate legal remedy.). Accordingly, we deny relief on the
petition for writ of mandamus.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted August 25, 2015 Opinion Delivered August 26, 2015 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Marvin Holmes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marvin-holmes-texapp-2015.