in Re Marvin Holmes
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
NO. 09-15-00318-CR
IN RE MARVIN HOLMES
Original Proceeding
Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 08-04992-A
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Marvin Holmes filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, in which he alleges that the trial court illegally sentenced him after he pleaded no contest pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. Holmes has not demonstrated that he is clearly entitled to mandamus relief from this Court. See State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (orig. proceeding) (To demonstrate entitlement to a writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that the trial court failed to perform a ministerial duty, and that
relator has no other adequate legal remedy.). Accordingly, we deny relief on the petition for writ of mandamus.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted August 25, 2015 Opinion Delivered August 26, 2015 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Marvin Holmes (in Re Marvin Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.