in Re Marvin Holmes

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 26, 2015·No. 09-15-00318-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

NO. 09-15-00318-CR

IN RE MARVIN HOLMES

Original Proceeding

Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 08-04992-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Marvin Holmes filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, in which he alleges that the trial court illegally sentenced him after he pleaded no contest pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. Holmes has not demonstrated that he is clearly entitled to mandamus relief from this Court. See State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (orig. proceeding) (To demonstrate entitlement to a writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that the trial court failed to perform a ministerial duty, and that

relator has no other adequate legal remedy.). Accordingly, we deny relief on the petition for writ of mandamus.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted August 25, 2015 Opinion Delivered August 26, 2015 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Marvin Holmes, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

in Re Marvin Holmes (in Re Marvin Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. Court of Appeals for Fifth Dist.
34 S.W.3d 924 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)