in Re: Marvin Dean Goodson
This text of in Re: Marvin Dean Goodson (in Re: Marvin Dean Goodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-05-00134-CV
NO. 12-05-00135-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§
IN RE: MARVIN DEAN GOODSON § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Marvin Dean Goodson filed these original proceedings requesting that this Court dismiss all charges against him because of the alleged delay of the trial court and ineffective assistance of counsel. We deny the writs.
A party seeking mandamus relief must generally bring forward all that is necessary to establish the claim for relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52. This includes providing an adequate record to substantiate the allegations contained in the petition for mandamus. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). Without a sufficient record, a party seeking mandamus relief has not proved any entitlement to the writ. Id. Relator’s motion does not comply with rules 52.3 and 52.7 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Therefore, we are unable to determine that he is entitled to relief. Accordingly, the petitions for writ of mandamus are denied.
JAMES T. WORTHEN
Chief Justice
Opinion delivered April 29, 2005.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. and DeVasto, J.
(PUBLISH)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Marvin Dean Goodson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marvin-dean-goodson-texapp-2005.