In re Marvin B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Marvin B.

271 A.D.2d 337, 706 N.Y.S.2d 643, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 337 (In re Marvin B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Marvin B., 271 A.D.2d 337, 706 N.Y.S.2d 643, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about August 20, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted robbery in the first degree, and placed him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence of threatened use of force and of accessorial liability. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Ellerin, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about August 20, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted robbery in the first degree, and placed him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence of threatened use of force and of accessorial liability. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Ellerin, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 337, 706 N.Y.S.2d 643, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marvin-b-nyappdiv-2000.