In re Martin
This text of 83 A.D.2d 913 (In re Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By order returnable August 17, respondent was directed to show cause why he should not be suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law pending his compliance with an order which had directed his appearance on July 17,1981 for examination under oath regarding inquiries under investigation by petitioner. Application granted by default, and respondent, George T. Martin, suspended as an attorney and counselor at law until further order of this court. Order entered. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 A.D.2d 913, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-martin-nyappdiv-1981.