In re Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Martin

253 A.D. 201, 1 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8395

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 201 (In re Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Martin, 253 A.D. 201, 1 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent was employed by the Lumber Mutual Casualty Insurance Company as attorney and adjuster. About eight months after the inception of his employment he commenced to take small sums from his employer by making fictitious charges. This practice he systematically continued for almost two years, the total amounting to $1,400. These amounts he confessedly converted from time to time whenever he needed money for his personal use.

The respondent should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The respondent was employed by the Lumber Mutual Casualty Insurance Company as attorney and adjuster. About eight months after the inception of his employment he commenced to take small sums from his employer by making fictitious charges. This practice he systematically continued for almost two years, the total amounting to $1,400. These amounts he confessedly converted from time to time whenever he needed money for his personal use.

The respondent should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 201, 1 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-martin-nyappdiv-1938.