In re Martin

825 A.2d 1142, 176 N.J. 518, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 690
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJuly 2, 2003
StatusPublished

This text of 825 A.2d 1142 (In re Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Martin, 825 A.2d 1142, 176 N.J. 518, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 690 (N.J. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed reports with the Supreme Court in DRB 96-222/226, DRB 97-062/064, DRB 98-028/099, DRB 98-265, DRB 99-391, DRB 00-021, DRB 00-024 and DRB 00-071, recommending that ARTHUR N. MARTIN, JR., of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law by consent since July 1, 1998, be disciplined for misconduct in fifteen matters, including multiple violations of RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect) RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to keep client reasonably informed and failure to respond to reasonable requests for information), RPC 1.5 (unreasonable fee), RPC 1.5(b)(failure to communicate basis or rate of fee within reasonable time after being retained by individual), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with [519]*519disciplinary authorities), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And ARTHUR N. MARTIN, JR., having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ARTHUR N. MARTIN, JR., be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that ARTHUR N. MARTIN, JR., be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
825 A.2d 1142, 176 N.J. 518, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-martin-nj-2003.