In re Martin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Martin

700 A.2d 1230, 151 N.J. 475, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 353

DecidedOctober 16, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 700 A.2d 1230 (In re Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Martin, 700 A.2d 1230, 151 N.J. 475, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 353 (N.J. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on June 20, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that ROBERT L. MARTIN of ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate with a client); and RPC 1.8(a) (conflict of interest — prohibited business transaction with client); and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT L. MARTIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on June 20, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that ROBERT L. MARTIN of ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate with a client); and RPC 1.8(a) (conflict of interest — prohibited business transaction with client); and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT L. MARTIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

700 A.2d 1230, 151 N.J. 475, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-martin-nj-1997.