In re Martin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Martin

138 So. 3d 1229, 2014 WL 2196419, 2014 La. LEXIS 1234

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 La. LEXIS 1528 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 23, 2014·No. No. 2014-B-0895·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

11 Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that she failed to return a client file upon request. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that J. Renee Martin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 30161, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

11 Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that she failed to return a client file upon request. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that J. Renee Martin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 30161, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

In re Martin, 138 So. 3d 1229, 2014 WL 2196419, 2014 La. LEXIS 1234 (La. 2014).

Pincite

138 So. 3d 1229 (In re Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.