In re Martin
This text of 138 So. 3d 1229 (In re Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
11 Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that she failed to return a client file upon request. Having reviewed the petition,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that J. Renee Martin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 30161, be publicly reprimanded.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 So. 3d 1229, 2014 WL 2196419, 2014 La. LEXIS 1234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-martin-la-2014.