in Re: Martha L. Arango
This text of in Re: Martha L. Arango (in Re: Martha L. Arango) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-06-095-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
__________________________________________________________________
IN RE MARTHA L. ARANGO
__________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Castillo
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]
Relator, Martha L. Arango, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on March 3, 2006. Real Party in Interest, John G. Garcia, filed a response on March 7, 2006. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response, is of the opinion that relator has not shown herself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this 10th day of March, 2006.
[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Martha L. Arango, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-martha-l-arango-texapp-2006.