in Re: Marshal Glenn Kea

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 27, 2001
Docket06-01-00155-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Marshal Glenn Kea (in Re: Marshal Glenn Kea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Marshal Glenn Kea, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

6-96-028-CV Long Trusts v. Dowd


In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________



No. 06-01-00155-CV



IN RE: MARSHAL GLENN KEA





Original Mandamus Proceeding







Before Cornelius, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ.

Opinion by Justice Grant

O P I N I O N



Marshal Kea has filed a petition seeking a writ of mandamus against the Honorable G. Timothy Boswell, District Judge of the 402nd Judicial District Court of Wood County, Texas. Kea has unsuccessfully attempted to obtain a reporter's record from the proceeding at which he was sentenced to prison. The sentencing occurred on November 18, 1994, and no reporter's record of that hearing exists. Kea asks this court to order the district judge to grant him a new trial because the court reporter had disposed of her notes taken at the trial that led to his incarceration. (1)

Mandamus issues only when the mandamus record establishes (1) a clear abuse of discretion or the violation of a duty imposed by law and (2) the absence of a clear and adequate remedy at law. Cantu v. Longoria, 878 S.W.2d 131 (Tex. 1994); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992). In this case, the trial court had no authority at this late date to order a new trial, and thus the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to do so.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.



Ben Z. Grant

Justice



Date Submitted: November 26, 2001

Date Decided: November 27, 2001



Do Not Publish

1. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 52.046(a)(4) (Vernon 1998) requires a court reporter to preserve notes for future reference for three years from the date on which they were taken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cantu v. Longoria
878 S.W.2d 131 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Marshal Glenn Kea, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marshal-glenn-kea-texapp-2001.