In RE MARRIAGE OF WESTHOFF v. Sauder

310 S.W.3d 752, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 675, 2010 WL 1976758
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 18, 2010
DocketED 93119
StatusPublished

This text of 310 S.W.3d 752 (In RE MARRIAGE OF WESTHOFF v. Sauder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In RE MARRIAGE OF WESTHOFF v. Sauder, 310 S.W.3d 752, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 675, 2010 WL 1976758 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Sauder, Jr. appeals from the trial court’s Judgment of Modification (judgment) modifying the decree dissolving his marriage to Deborah Lynn Westhoff, f/k/a Deborah Sauder. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment is not against the weight of the evidence nor did the trial court abuse its discretion. See, Malawey v. Malawey, 137 S.W.3d 518 (Mo.App. E.D.2004) (child custody); Forde v. Forde, 190 S.W.3d 521 (Mo.App. E.D.2006) (child support); Mehra v. Mehra, 819 S.W.2d 351, 357 (Mo.banc 1991) (attorney’s fees). An extended opinion would have no *753 precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Malawey v. Malawey
137 S.W.3d 518 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004)
Forde v. Forde
190 S.W.3d 521 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)
Mehra v. Mehra
819 S.W.2d 351 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
310 S.W.3d 752, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 675, 2010 WL 1976758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marriage-of-westhoff-v-sauder-moctapp-2010.