In RE MARRIAGE OF WESTHOFF v. Sauder

310 S.W.3d 752, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 675, 2010 WL 1976758
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 2010·No. ED 93119·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Sauder, Jr. appeals from the trial court’s Judgment of Modification (judgment) modifying the decree dissolving his marriage to Deborah Lynn Westhoff, f/k/a Deborah Sauder. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment is not against the weight of the evidence nor did the trial court abuse its discretion. See, Malawey v. Malawey, 137 S.W.3d 518 (Mo.App. E.D.2004) (child custody); Forde v. Forde, 190 S.W.3d 521 (Mo.App. E.D.2006) (child support); Mehra v. Mehra, 819 S.W.2d 351, 357 (Mo.banc 1991) (attorney’s fees). An extended opinion would have no *753 precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In RE MARRIAGE OF WESTHOFF v. Sauder, 310 S.W.3d 752, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 675, 2010 WL 1976758 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

310 S.W.3d 752 (In RE MARRIAGE OF WESTHOFF v. Sauder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malawey v. Malawey
137 S.W.3d 518 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004)
Forde v. Forde
190 S.W.3d 521 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)
Mehra v. Mehra
819 S.W.2d 351 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1991)