In Re Marriage of Stephens

Missouri Court of Appeals

In Re Marriage of Stephens

218 S.W.3d 574, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 264, 2007 WL 447226

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2007·No. ED 88313·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*575 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donna Rising Eagle appeals the judgment terminating Stephen Stephens’s maintenance obligation. The judgment was supported by substantial evidence, and the court did not misstate or misapply the law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*575 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donna Rising Eagle appeals the judgment terminating Stephen Stephens’s maintenance obligation. The judgment was supported by substantial evidence, and the court did not misstate or misapply the law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

In Re Marriage of Stephens, 218 S.W.3d 574, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 264, 2007 WL 447226 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

218 S.W.3d 574 (In Re Marriage of Stephens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related