In RE MARRIAGE OF STEINKE v. Steinke

379 N.W.2d 853, 127 Wis. 2d 444, 1986 Wisc. LEXIS 1650
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided January 24, 1986·No. 84-1337·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

(On motion for reconsideration). The motion for reconsideration is denied without costs.

In In re Marriage of Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis. 2d 372, 389, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985), immediately above the mandate, we delete the phrase "the actuarial present value of the entire interest at the time of trial was approximately $15,900."

We add the following sentence immediately above the mandate: An opinion as to actuarial present value was included in the record as an answer to an interrogatory, i.e., $15,900, but was not received in evidence. The amount is not conclusive on remand. The trial court must evaluate and include the interest in the pension in the property division; the parties may introduce evidence of the value of the pension interest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In RE MARRIAGE OF STEINKE v. Steinke, 379 N.W.2d 853, 127 Wis. 2d 444, 1986 Wisc. LEXIS 1650 (Wis. 1986).

379 N.W.2d 853 (In RE MARRIAGE OF STEINKE v. Steinke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lister
2012 WI 102 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2012)