In RE MARRIAGE OF STEINKE v. Steinke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

In RE MARRIAGE OF STEINKE v. Steinke

379 N.W.2d 853, 127 Wis. 2d 444, 1986 Wisc. LEXIS 1650

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 24, 1986

Docket84-1337

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 379 N.W.2d 853 (In RE MARRIAGE OF STEINKE v. Steinke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In RE MARRIAGE OF STEINKE v. Steinke, 379 N.W.2d 853, 127 Wis. 2d 444, 1986 Wisc. LEXIS 1650 (Wis. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

(On motion for reconsideration). The motion for reconsideration is denied without costs.

In In re Marriage of Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis. 2d 372, 389, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985), immediately above the mandate, we delete the phrase "the actuarial present value of the entire interest at the time of trial was approximately $15,900."

We add the following sentence immediately above the mandate: An opinion as to actuarial present value was included in the record as an answer to an interrogatory, i.e., $15,900, but was not received in evidence. The amount is not conclusive on remand. The trial court must evaluate and include the interest in the pension in the property division; the parties may introduce evidence of the value of the pension interest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

(On motion for reconsideration). The motion for reconsideration is denied without costs.

In In re Marriage of Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis. 2d 372, 389, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985), immediately above the mandate, we delete the phrase "the actuarial present value of the entire interest at the time of trial was approximately $15,900."

We add the following sentence immediately above the mandate: An opinion as to actuarial present value was included in the record as an answer to an interrogatory, i.e., $15,900, but was not received in evidence. The amount is not conclusive on remand. The trial court must evaluate and include the interest in the pension in the property division; the parties may introduce evidence of the value of the pension interest.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

379 N.W.2d 853, 127 Wis. 2d 444, 1986 Wisc. LEXIS 1650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marriage-of-steinke-v-steinke-wis-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack