In Re Marriage of Peters

163 S.W.3d 485, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 667, 2005 WL 1018179
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 3, 2005·No. ED 84505·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Former husband appeals from a judgment of the trial court modifying maintenance and child support. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Former wife’s motion to dismiss appeal for failure to comply with Rule 84.04 is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Marriage of Peters, 163 S.W.3d 485, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 667, 2005 WL 1018179 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

163 S.W.3d 485 (In Re Marriage of Peters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)