In RE MARRIAGE OF MACKMAN-YATES v. Yates

Missouri Court of Appeals

In RE MARRIAGE OF MACKMAN-YATES v. Yates

266 S.W.3d 328, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1402, 2008 WL 4553039

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 14, 2008

DocketED 90706

StatusPublished

This text of 266 S.W.3d 328 (In RE MARRIAGE OF MACKMAN-YATES v. Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In RE MARRIAGE OF MACKMAN-YATES v. Yates, 266 S.W.3d 328, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1402, 2008 WL 4553039 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Milne Yates (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s judgment entered in favor of Jacqueline Mackman-Yates (Respondent). Appellant raises three points of error on appeal. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude *329 that the trial court did not err. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Milne Yates (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s judgment entered in favor of Jacqueline Mackman-Yates (Respondent). Appellant raises three points of error on appeal. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude *329 that the trial court did not err. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 S.W.3d 328, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1402, 2008 WL 4553039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marriage-of-mackman-yates-v-yates-moctapp-2008.