In RE MARRIAGE OF HEIDEMAN v. Heideman

Missouri Court of Appeals

In RE MARRIAGE OF HEIDEMAN v. Heideman

218 S.W.3d 575, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 330

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 27, 2007

DocketED 87828

StatusPublished

This text of 218 S.W.3d 575 (In RE MARRIAGE OF HEIDEMAN v. Heideman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In RE MARRIAGE OF HEIDEMAN v. Heideman, 218 S.W.3d 575, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 330 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Heideman (“husband”) appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to quash the application and notice of income withholding filed by Nancy Heideman (“wife”). Husband claims the court erred in finding the terms of the marital settlement agreement too vague to be enforceable because the terms were definite and certain.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI