in Re Marquel Clemons
This text of in Re Marquel Clemons (in Re Marquel Clemons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-08-00451-CR
IN RE Marquel CLEMONS
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and filed: July 16, 2008
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On June 25, 2008, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the respondent has not ruled on his motion for a speedy trial. Counsel has been appointed to represent relator in the trial court. We conclude that appointed counsel for relator is also his counsel for an original proceeding on the issues presented. Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator's pro se petition for writ of mandamus will be treated as presenting nothing for this court's consideration. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Consequently, this court has determined that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition is DENIED. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Do not publish
1. This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CR-3731, styled The State of Texas v. Marquel Clemons,
pending in the 379th Judicial Court, Bexar County, Texas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Marquel Clemons, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marquel-clemons-texapp-2008.