in Re Marquel Clemons
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-08-00451-CR
IN RE Marquel CLEMONS
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and filed: July 16, 2008
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On June 25, 2008, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the
respondent has not ruled on his motion for a speedy trial. Counsel has been appointed to represent
relator in the trial court. We conclude that appointed counsel for relator is also his counsel for an
original proceeding on the issues presented. Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. See
Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid
representation means relator’s pro se petition for writ of mandamus will be treated as presenting
nothing for this court’s consideration. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.
App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Consequently, this court has determined that
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CR-3731, styled The State of Texas v. Marquel Clemons, pending in the 379th Judicial Court, Bexar County, Texas. 04-08-00451-CR
relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition is DENIED. TEX . R. APP . P.
52.8(a).
Do not publish
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Marquel Clemons (in Re Marquel Clemons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.