In re Marquand

Second Circuit

In re Marquand

57 F. 189, 6 C.C.A. 309, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2161

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 24, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 57 F. 189 (In re Marquand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Marquand, 57 F. 189, 6 C.C.A. 309, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2161 (2d Cir. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

SHIPMAN, Circuit Judge,

(after stating the facts as above.) The application of Henry Q. Marquand for leave to present the facts stated in his affidavit to the collector of customs or the board of general appraisers or other officer of the customs, and for leave to petition the collector or other proper officer to remit the duties upon the Eros, and the motion that the mandate contain the language, “without prejudice to such application, or to an application of the said Marquand for a new trial from the circuit court upon said facts,” is not granted. It is not within the province of this court to grant or to withhold leave to apply to an officer of the customs for a remission of duties, or, in case a judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, to direct or suggest its action in regard to new trials upon newly-discovered evidence or newly-ascertained facts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHIPMAN, Circuit Judge,

(after stating the facts as above.) The application of Henry Q. Marquand for leave to present the facts stated in his affidavit to the collector of customs or the board of general appraisers or other officer of the customs, and for leave to petition the collector or other proper officer to remit the duties upon the Eros, and the motion that the mandate contain the language, “without prejudice to such application, or to an application of the said Marquand for a new trial from the circuit court upon said facts,” is not granted. It is not within the province of this court to grant or to withhold leave to apply to an officer of the customs for a remission of duties, or, in case a judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, to direct or suggest its action in regard to new trials upon newly-discovered evidence or newly-ascertained facts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 F. 189, 6 C.C.A. 309, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marquand-ca2-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack