In Re Marqis Taffe v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 13, 2025·No. 01-25-00901-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued November 13, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

against (1) a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county court in the court of appeals district; (2) a judge of a district court who is acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry under Chapter 52 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the court of appeals district; or (3) an associate judge of a district or county court appointed by a judge under Chapter 201 of the Family Code in the court of appeals district for the judge who appointed the associate judge. Id. § 22.221(b), (c). The courts of appeals also may issue all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Id. § 22.221(a).

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus requests that this Court issue a writ of mandamus against a justice court. This Court lacks mandamus jurisdiction over a justice court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b), (c); see also In re Jackson, No. 01–15–00822–CV, 2016 WL 269263, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 21, 2016, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (dismissing mandamus petition for want of jurisdiction against justice of peace) (citations omitted). Relator’s petition does not demonstrate that the relief he requests is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction.

We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Gunn, and Caughey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Marqis Taffe v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

In Re Marqis Taffe v. the State of Texas (In Re Marqis Taffe v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.