in Re MAROPCO, INC.

Opinion

Opinion issued July 23, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

P. 42.1(c). Further, although the motion does not include a certificate of

conference, more than ten days have passed and no party has responded to the

motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the petition for a writ of

mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-15-00579-CV ——————————— IN RE MAROPCO, INC., Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, MarOpCo, Inc., filed a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a temporary restraining order.1 Relator, representing that the temporary restraining order has been dissolved by an agreed order and the mandamus petition is moot, has filed a motion to dismiss the petition. No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. 1 The underlying case is Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C. v. MarOpCo, Inc., cause number 2015-35950, in the 11th District Court of Harris County, Texas.