In re Marlowe

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Marlowe

702 A.2d 474, 152 N.J. 20, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 561

DecidedNovember 13, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 702 A.2d 474 (In re Marlowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Marlowe, 702 A.2d 474, 152 N.J. 20, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 561 (N.J. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on September 11, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that ALAN MARLOWE of MIDLAND PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year for unethical conduct, including gross neglect, failure to abide by a Ghent’s wishes, failure to act with due diligence, failure to keep his client reasonably informed, failure to comply with attorney recordkeeping requirements, failure to cooperate with the disciplinary authorities, and failure to notify existing clients of his suspension from practice, all in violation of RPC 1.1(a), RPC 1.2(a), RPC 1.3, RPC 1.4, RPC 1.15, RPC 8.1(b), and RPC 8.4;

And the Disciplinary Review Board further having concluded that on reinstatement to practice, respondent should be required to submit proof of his psychological fitness to practice law and should be required to practice only under supervision;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ALAN MARLOWE is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year, effective December 8, 1997, and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that prior to reinstatement to practice, respondent shall submit competent medical proof of his psychological fitness to practice law; and it is further

ORDERED that on reinstatement to practice, respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

[21]*21ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on September 11, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that ALAN MARLOWE of MIDLAND PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year for unethical conduct, including gross neglect, failure to abide by a Ghent’s wishes, failure to act with due diligence, failure to keep his client reasonably informed, failure to comply with attorney recordkeeping requirements, failure to cooperate with the disciplinary authorities, and failure to notify existing clients of his suspension from practice, all in violation of RPC 1.1(a), RPC 1.2(a), RPC 1.3, RPC 1.4, RPC 1.15, RPC 8.1(b), and RPC 8.4;

And the Disciplinary Review Board further having concluded that on reinstatement to practice, respondent should be required to submit proof of his psychological fitness to practice law and should be required to practice only under supervision;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ALAN MARLOWE is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year, effective December 8, 1997, and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that prior to reinstatement to practice, respondent shall submit competent medical proof of his psychological fitness to practice law; and it is further

ORDERED that on reinstatement to practice, respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

[21]*21ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

702 A.2d 474, 152 N.J. 20, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marlowe-nj-1997.