In re Mark

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Mark

624 A.2d 1368, 132 N.J. 268, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 117

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJune 8, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 624 A.2d 1368 (In re Mark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mark, 624 A.2d 1368, 132 N.J. 268, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 117 (N.J. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court recommending that MICHAEL A. MARK of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for oral and written misrepresentations to a court and to his adversary in litigation, in violation of RPC 3.3, RPC 3.4, RPC 8.4(c) and (d), and good cause appearing;

[269]*269It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are hereby adopted and MICHAEL A. MARK of HACKENSACK is suspended from practice for a period of three months, effective June 28, 1993, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED the respondent shall be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI